Tag: high fluoro wax

  • From Scarcity to an “Ah Hah” Moment: Reclaimed Fluoros Keep Skis Fast

    From Scarcity to an “Ah Hah” Moment: Reclaimed Fluoros Keep Skis Fast

    For six in the morning, the text message was dark and terrifying. “They are not selling ski crack any more. WTF they can’t be out.”

    At the time of the message, Jarrod had no idea he had a substance abuse issue or how far it would take him down a path of desperation. He just wanted to ski faster. He continues recounting the morning he hit the bottom.

    “With the realization, I might be out I was wide awake and sucking down a second cup of coffee. Not gonna lie, I was super anxious when I opened the dealer’s website. Clicking to the fluoro overlay page; my friend, Bill, was correct. Each fluoro product just said: THESE PRODUCTS TEMPORARILY UNAVAILABLE. Not just pure powder overlay but any wax containing fluoro compounds had the same banner: THESE PRODUCTS TEMPORARILY UNAVAILABLE. Looking around to see if anybody else had been reading my screen, I closed the laptop and hastened out to the shop. Unceremoniously I dumped my wax kit on the work-bench pawing through everything to check on my stash. Ut-oh. I was in trouble.”

    Jarrod was beginning to see he had a problem. His wax kit was almost out of fluoro powder and a web search indicated “ski-crack” as he had joked about, was currently unavailable in the US and foreign distributors would not ship into this country.

    A bit of research found the unavailability is due to wax companies having to comply with The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) which regulates the import or development of new chemicals. Fluorinated compounds have been in use since the 1950s and it is only recently the wax companies have been under scrutiny by the EPA and subject to the petition and request to import or manufacture anything containing a fluorinated molecule.

    A bit more research into fluorinated chemicals determined most of the EPA worries stem from a class of compounds falling under the C8 designation. These compounds are commonly used in the production of plastics used to insulate wire. Bennington Vermont had a very public court battle over an aquifer contaminated by perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctyl sulfonic acid (PFOS). Both chemicals are known to bioaccumulate in wildlife and are suspected to be human carcinogens.

    Whether the impounded ski waxes contain C8 compounds is unknown. In order to avoid potential jail time and large fines, many wax companies voluntarily quarantined the stock of waxes containing fluoros until obtaining EPA approval to import, manufacture and distribute the products. But this may have created a black market for fluoros:

    Jarrod continues explaining his anxiety. “ When I pressed my wax dealer to sell me some fluff he said, ‘Hey, man, the feds are sniffing around. I gotta play it cool. Can’t do any deals online or over the phone. Sorry. No way. But if you’re in the area, dude, stop by the shop for a cup of coffee. Come alone.’ ”

    When Jarrod first approached me with his dilemma it felt surreal. Ski wax is a micro market and fluoro waxes an even smaller slice of a niche market. The expense of covering all bases to comply with TSCA could be significant and delay access to Jarrod’s ski crack.

    Describing how he fell into the almost daily use of fluoro powder Jarrod said at first it was just a fad used for fun.

    “I had found at a price so reasonable powdering the bases was an everyday affair. My racing days are long behind me and having skis move across the snow enhanced by the miracle of better living through chemistry brought pure joy to every day on the trails.

    “This season my habit resulted in using almost 200 grams of pure powder. My stash was down to 15g. With rationing I might make it through this season, but what if my dealer can’t get the dust for next year? To satisfy this dependency another source needed to be found – the sooner the quicker.” Jarrod’s voice began to tremble.

    “The snow was perfect. A few days old with a bit of freeze thaw cycles and impeccable grooming. The skiing would be fast if tar was applied to the bases. But with a touch of crack, orgasmic. I was starting to feel the jitters, that need pulling at my gut, my bases dragging across the snow. The fear of running out.”

    Jarrod skied that day using HF wax with a bit of structure rolled in for good measure. The skiing was fast but it might have been better. While sipping a beer he began hatching a plan to keep his supply of powder and maybe a way to make a little cash too.

    Scenes of young kids in hoodies hanging trailside at busy intersections, furtive glances, a brief exchange of words, a $20 bill handed over, the kid giving instructions like a ski-o map to the pickup intersection, where, with relief and craven fulfillment the small ziplock bag of sanctified white powder, the powder of the Nordic gods, is placed into my gloved hand, quickly stowed in pocket, zipped securely and I ski off knowing I’ll make it through another week of ski waxing.

    The fantasy began to become a reality after receiving a spam text from Expedia advertising cheap airfare. “I considered the lucrative black market potential here. Fly round trip JFK to Oslo (Norwegian Air has convenient, affordable, direct flights and allows two huge checked bags in the Premium Cabin), fill my duffle bags with pure unadulterated dust and set up shop trailside with a few warmly dressed outdoorsy juvenile delinquents as runners. With a little mob-style enforcement I was confident that I could secure exclusive dealer intersection concessions at the largest nordic centers in Vermont. True, I might have to break a few skis or loosen some grips to gain the respect this trade would demand, but I’d be swimming in cash and the demand for product would only grow.”

    In fact, the growth of demand was going to be problematic. Affordable fluoros create quick dependencies. With the EPA banning all fluoros, skiers who have even once felt the bliss of powdered skis might succumb to temptation and be unable to help themselves.

    Now looking relaxed and contemplative Jarrod finished explaining his plan. “I needed to think bigger. Not regional but national in scale. I would need to franchise and manage dealer thugs from Fort Kent, ME to Snoqualmie, WA. I would need a whole crew of travelers going back and forth to Europe with huge duffle bags stuffed with ski fluff – the stuff likely poofing out in huge white clouds as the bags get tossed around. I would need a trucking network. Or perhaps I could piggy back my supply and distribution chains onto an established elicit network….. Perhaps using Russian diplomats in black stretch limos on route to Trump Resorts. Nobody would mess with those guys and they probably had connections to the Chinese who routinely scoff at US environmental laws. Hell, they’d make fluoro powder cheap and maybe for free if it meant they could flip a political finger at the US.”

    “Perhaps” Jarrod paused, “distribution could be piggy backed onto the untold legions of drug dealers and ruthless criminals we’re told are hiking for miles through tortuous desert terrain to enter the US illegally at the virtually unguarded southern border?”

    Looking at his hands before wiping his face he jumped up off the Windsor chair, took a deep breath and continued.

    “NO.” He began thinking about his mom and how she believed her ability to raise a child could only be considered a success if the kids were not a burden on society or in jail by the time they turned 30 years old. Jarrod was 29. His introspection continued. Here he verbalizes his thoughts.

    “There must be a better way to source ski crack – legally – above reproach. More research indicated the industry using the majority of fluoro compounds was the printing and food industries. Floriated compounds along with titanium dioxide are added to inks to harden and brighten the color. The fluoros are added to keep the ink from sticking to other boxes and also from sticking to the shelves. A conversation with my powder supplier revealed the C6 class of Fluoros used in ink is the same used on non-stick cookware and just might be the same compounds used in ski wax. Fluoros are added to ink at a concentration of 100 parts per million (PPM) or one gram per ten kilograms of ink.”

    With less dark thoughts Jarrod recalled some of what he learned in law school which he graduated from but never did anything with his degree but pay for it. A review of RCRA  Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) is explicit mentioning Pulping liquors, the solution used to disperse and suspend wood fibers for the paper making process, that are reclaimed as defined in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) section 261.1(c), are exempt.  A subset of 261.1(c),  40 CFR section 261.4(a)(6) gave him a loophole to extract the C6 fluoros from the ink and apply it to skis. The only TSCA requirement was filling out a one-page form informing EPA of the exemptions.

    The extraction process is relatively simple although it requires a huge volume of ink covered material. The highest concentrations of fluoro is added to inks used in grocery products. The food producers discovered a long time ago the integrity of the packaging matters to consumers. A deformed or blemished box reminds them of second hand or discount food and is significantly less appealing therefore they buy less of the product. Brand loyalty is also reduced when consumers continue to see blemished boxes on shelves. Boxed food is subject to a wide range of humidity during the manufacture, storage, distribution and display. This moisture causes the boxes to stick together and to shelving hence the value of the added fluoro compounds. More fluoro equals less sticking equals greater sales, market share and profits.

    Finding the products and brands with the highest concentration of fluoro was difficult due to the trade secret protections of the Patent and Trade Office of the US Government. Many corporations do not file for patents on their products because the patenting process demands full disclosure of materials and methods in order to obtain patent protection. Anything declared a trade secret does not carry any exclusive rights to manufacture but unlike the patent process, a trade secret does not have to disclose anything about the product. The trade secret laws, CFR 4.01.2019(a)(f), are how big oil remains exempt from disclosing what is contained in the fluids used during the fracking process.

    With a newfound and responsible way to obtain his desired ski crack, Jarrod became animated describing the next step in his journey.

    “If I was going into business, I intended to do it right. Research-based information would be the foundation upon which I would build this financial empire. And that starts with testing.”

    After a disastrous grocery store aisle experiment designed to ascertain which cereal boxes have the most fluoros, wherein shelves were tipped to (and, sadly, far beyond) the exact angle of boxed product repose and slippage was measured, a better idea presented itself – as is so often the case with such complicated testing procedures. “We made a spring clip to grasp the box by the corners and attached the clip to a scale. By pulling on the scale and tracking the measurements we were able to see which products and brands had the least amount of stiction. Turns out the boxes with the lowest shelf friction contained the highest levels of fluoros. The best part is the test is easily administered right in the store which gave access to a wide variety of products.

    “As a generalization, packaging without liners like pasta are significantly slipperier than packages with an internal plastic liner like cereals and cookies. We found that the spring tension when testing unlined boxed product needed to be significantly lower than for lined boxes – like breakfast cereals –  because the test apparatus flung three-pound boxes of spaghetti down the aisle 20 or 30 feet smashing into displays of K-Cups and Yodels, scattering the dry noodles all over the aisle. We surmise the hydrophilic nature of the pasta is countered by the higher levels of fluoros in the ink. If the product requires a liner there is less incentive to use HF inks, which like ski waxes, are more expensive. For our purposes, the cereal and cracker boxes are less appealing.”

    Acquiring and processing the large volume of pasta boxes was going to take a large capital investment. More research into environmental regulation turned up.  The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) signed into law by President Bill Clinton on August 22, 1996 has a provision to grant $1.1M  for startup entrepreneurs who build a business around recycling. The current Administration’s trade tariffs with China has this far east nation once hungry for US recycled paper products finding the raw materials from South America. There is a glut of recycled paper with much of it ending up in landfills as there is a very limited domestic market for this paper. After finding a sympathetic clerk in the Commerce Department whose job it is to find uses for this glut, the paperwork was pushed through and financing was secured.

    “Once we had a process and financing it was as simple as asking the local recycling companies for as much recycled boxboard they had. There is a glut of recycled materials and all suppliers were ecstatic to have a place to offload some of the stockpile. They are even willing to sort the product removing as much of the desired pasta boxes in order to receive the best price for the materials. They even deliver the materials for free just to get rid of it. It’s a win-win all around.”

    The material science and chemistry involved in extracting the finished fluoros from recycled pasta box ink is proprietary. Soon enough boxboard was being processed and the operation moved from the basement into a 20’ by 30’ shop. Employees were hired and the business was legitimized.

    betnovate

    “The quality of the fluorocarbons recovered exceeds our wildest hopes,” says the plant manager and general ski bum who asked us to refer to him only as Jeff K. “By tweaking the extraction with a Birch Extraction we are able to link hydrocarbon molecules from the inks with the fluoros we were after. There were two benefits to this. By selecting for the right colors consistent with the familiar waxing chart we have modified fluoros that are temperature specific and color coded. We also found that when our unique mixes are applied to ski bases they bond structurally to the pores of the ski base – somewhat like the crisp shiny smooth surface on the outside of a pasta box compared to the un-printed inside of the box board – creating an incredibly durable and long lasting fluoro treatment high. In testing we found no deterioration of the glide even after 100km of the gnarliest, most crusted, corn snow you can ski.”

    Jarrod, the ski crack addict turned environmental entrepreneur named the company Box Butter. This wholly US based company has removed 30 million tons of box board from the recycling stream heading to China. All production energy is solar sourced and they are a Green Initiative Certified Zero Emission Company. A side product still in development to repurpose much of the fiber will hit the market shortly: Cracklin’ Cubes fire starters, light easily – even when wet – and burn for 10-12 minutes. “Another totally addictive, environmentally friendly,100% recycled product from the company that brought you environmentally friendly skier’s crack fluoro overlays,” says John Rollings, a competitive biathlete and an early investor. “These guys brought the fun back into skiing after the feds tried to shut down virgin fluoros. And when you’re comin’ down, ready to peel off the boards and sit by a roaring fire, they make it easy to spark up!”

    Jarrod sums up his 11 month journey from crack addict to wealthy businessman. “Sure I still use powders, every time I ski. After setting aside a 55-gallon barrel of the stuff for my own use I can relax. Even if the feds ban the stuff there is enough for me and my ski buddies to last a lifetime and if I run out there is really no point in living through another winter without the powdered white stuff to enjoy.”

    For a limited time Box Butter is offering free samples of Skier’s Crack Reclaimed Fluoro Overlays through their website https://boxbutterbuzz.bz.

     

  • Op-Ed: Should the Nordic Ski World be Considering the “4%” Effect?

    Nike Worldwide HQ, Beaverton, Ore. Where R&D and fast splits manifest in products like the Nike Zoom Vaporfly 4%. (Photo: Nike)

    (The following op-ed is an opinion piece submitted by an author unassociated with FasterSkier. Viewpoints do not necessarily reflect that of FasterSkier’s staff or sponsors. We fully support open dialogue and encourage the use of the comments section at the bottom of this page to express varying views. To submit an op-ed, email info@fasterskier.com.)

    About the author: Ryan Sederquist is the University of Maine at Presque Isle Head Nordic Ski Coach and is a competitive runner. This op-ed is also the opinion of Sederquist and not the University of Maine at Presque Isle. 

    “It’s a shoe,” Huddle says. “I don’t want to take away from what the athlete is doing. I wouldn’t say that Shalane [Flanagan] didn’t win New York if she didn’t wear Vaporflys because she’s an amazing athlete. I’m not really in the lab…I think if it’s really gonna be like the wetsuits in swimming, it’s either going to be something everyone starts making or it’ll be wiped out of the sport. So I think we’re still kind of in that tipping point to see which way it goes.”

    “I coach Parker Stinson [who runs for Saucony],” says Brad Hudson. “He’s pissed about it every day, trust me. They’re working on their own [shoe], trust me! He lost to [Nike athlete] Chris Derrick by two seconds in the US Half [Marathon Championships]. Okay, he outkicked Parker. Parker’s like, my shoe’s like a moccasin. He’s not making fun of Saucony — Saucony, they make good stuff.”

    Fast, red, and marketed as 4 percent faster: the Nike Zoom Vaporfly 4%. (Photo: @Gringsportivo Instagram screenshot)

    These two quotes show a stark contrast of viewpoints over the controversy surrounding Nike’s Vaporfly 4%, a shoe whose prototypes were worn by all three medalists in the men’s marathon at the Rio Olympic Games in 2016. The Vaporfly 4% was also part of Eliud Kipchoge’s “Breaking 2” effort and his world record 2:01:39 hours in Berlin this year. And  looking back at the winner of each Marathon Major in the past two years, yes, lots of Vaporfly 4% use.

    The patented carbon fiber plate, which supposedly acts as a spring, reducing effort as it propels runners forward, has led to an arm’s race amongst shoe companies, and in turn infecting the confidence of some runners in the process. From fringe Boston Marathon Qualifiers to the Olympic Trial’s favorites, no longer is the sport the raw equalizer it once was. Now, one is left to doubt whether or not they are on equal footing (pun intended) with their competitors and are truly giving themselves the best chance to win, or if by putting on a shoe, they could shave off precious seconds.

    Hopefully, you are starting to see a connection to our beloved sport of nordic skiing. If not, I’d encourage you to think critically as you read this, thoughtfully considering why our sport struggles to connect with a wider audience by failing to provide an accessible and equal playing field to all. You see, unfortunately, whereas running has now been presented with the “4% advantage” dilemma, I would argue that faster, better skis which are only worn by those on the World Cup (or by someone knows someone who races on the World Cup), as well as astronomically priced waxes, have created something Nike would, if packaged into a squeaky “sneaker,” so to speak, probably promote as the “15% Vaporfly.”

    While running and cross-country skiing have commonalities, from the types and distances of races to the personalities and preferences of athletes who participate in them, there are obvious differences. In order to be a great runner, you need a great aerobic engine, a high running economy, and above average mental strength.

    Success in nordic skiing requires this too, plus a focus on two additional complex elements: ski technique and ski science. Ski science, in this case, refers to ski construction and ski preparation, two topics which I know, by lumping them together, will have experts in those respective fields going crazy, but for simplicity’s sake, we will divide the triarchy into those three things – physiology/psychology, ski specific skill and technique, and ski science.  

    It is the mastery of this three pronged beast that I believe makes nordic skiing challenging, rewarding, and almost addicting. Running is boring, comparatively speaking (this is coming from a guy who runs between 70-90 miles per week for the entire year, so take that for what it is worth), partially because it is so simple. Run hard, run fast, recover, eat,repeat. Yes, doing things like striders, drills, hill sprints, and plyometrics can certainly help you become a more biomechanically efficient runner. But let’s face it: most of those drills were created by a junior high coach who was struggling to convince kids that running was more than just running.  

    At the end of the day, running is about getting from point A to point B faster than your opponent.

    That is the goal for skiing, too. But reflecting on the triarchy, there are many things you can improve and enhance to maximize your chances in cross-country ski racing. You can work on specific techniques, agility, balance, going up hills, down hills, cornering. You have poles, making the activity a full body coordination which engages the upper body in a much more substantial manner than the arm swing of running. There are even two distinct disciplines – when you have had enough classic skiing, you can switch to skate. It is this combination of fitness, strength, and skill that makes going out for a ski each day a lot less mundane than the grueling regimen of a true distance runner.

    The complexity really only begins there. However, as the other major member of the triad, which you could refer to as the “nordic nerd” subject – the wax science and equipment management aspect – requires you to become a different type of ‘student of the sport,’ and should be ignored at your own peril.

    Actually, it can’t be ignored at all; it is so critical, people have centered their entire careers focused on its development, research, production, and application. The wax chemistry element of waxing  is something I believe is very unique and fascinating about the sport. Not only are skiers in competition to gain an advantage in fitness. They also are trying to figure out an advantage in technique. And finally, they are trying to win the war in the wax room.

    I love it. But I hate it.

    What makes running so great as a competitor and so easy to follow as a fan is the fact that we all are presumably on the same playing field. It is a raw sport. It is true. There is no question as to whether or not you or I are faster than Eliud Kipchoge. All you need to do is sign up for a race and put up a time (or hop on a treadmill and see how long you last at 4:35 mile pace … probably not 26.2 miles). We are on the same playing field so to speak. This gives fans an appreciation and attachment to the sport, to some degree.

    While runners may not care if they can match up with Kipchoge, they still want to know if they can match up with the “best version of themselves.” That desire is what brings us to lifelong sports like this in the first place. We want to chase after that true success – what John Wooden calls, “The satisfaction of knowing you gave 100% effort to fulfill your potential to the fullest.” With running, there is nothing stopping that. We are completely exposed – everyone is – for what we are really made of, and that is because we are all on the same playing field.

    A little wax testing on Gatineau’s 1.7 k sprint course, with the start/finish area visible at the upper right. (Photo: John Lazenby/lazenbyphoto.com)

    Is that true in skiing?

    At the local Turkey Trot, if I beat Joe-Bag-of-Donuts, I can rest assured that I had the better race on that day. If, at the New Year’s Eve 10k classic freestyle, he beats me by two minutes, it could have been because he nailed the wax (or just HAD access to the wax) and I didn’t, or because he simply owns a pair of $1,000 skis and $700 poles and I have wooden skis and bamboo poles given to me by Jackrabbit Johansen. While that is an extreme example, a more realistic one is what we see at competitive races such as the U.S. Championships.

    Like skiing, the U.S. road running circuit (and track as well) is open to anyone. If I hit a qualifying marathon time of 2:19 hours, I can run in the Olympic Qualifying Marathon (a goal that is shared by many runners post-collegiately). These goals are chased by runners because it is another chance for them to continue pursuing true success through high expectations, diligent training, and becoming all they can be. If they only can put up a 2:25 hours, that is where they are. It’s black and white. They don’t have to wonder.

    Let’s take a similar scenario in skiing. Suppose a master blaster desires to qualify for the U.S. Ski team. When he signs up for the men’s 30 k skate mass start distance final at Craftsbury, is he going up against athletes who have the same gear and wax as him? No.

    Does that matter? I would say, probably, yes, very much. How much? I’m not sure. Is it how the sport should be? I’m unsure again.

    I’m torn by how the elements of wax and ski quality are just “part of the game,” in the same way that defensive coordinators scheming to beat Drew Brees is just part of the NFL. It is cool that we can actually influence performance manipulating something that doesn’t involve blood, sweat, and tears, unless you count the blood from burning yourself on an iron, the sweat from endless scraping, and the tears from accidentally dumping out an entire fluorocarbon powder container onto the snow.

    Wouldn’t it be better for our sport if there was a more standardized setting? If, for example, every ski was made “equally?” Is that even possible? Maybe not. As far as waxes go, why doesn’t a governing body just publish a list of waxes that can be used – in any condition – such as the more egalitarian Rocky Mountain Nordic waxing protocols. To summarize, the coaches have agreed to use three types of glide wax depending on the day’s temperature. In other words, teams are required to use the exact same glide wax. We already see this controlled environment in rollerski races when competitors are required to use the same brand of skis with the same speed wheels.

    Don’t take this as me saying the best athletes in our country wouldn’t still be on top. But, it would provide a clearer way for us to see who actually is the fittest athlete and the best skier. The premium would be on those two prongs, as opposed to a third, which is only accessible by a few. One could argue that, whoever is at the top would garner even more respect from their peers, as there wouldn’t be the equipment/wax excuses for the others to fall back on.

    It’s crazy to think how the running community has been up in arms over the 4% shoe. A shoe that costs $250. That’s nothing in the nordic ski world. But that is part of the problem – because of the premium on equipment and waxing, we’ve created a community where only a select portion of our society can become members. To me, that might be the only real issue here worth discussing. We should want nordic skiing to be something everyone has a CHANCE to be in.

    Here is an even deeper thought: most skiers, like runners and cyclists and members of every other major endurance sport, champion clean sport. That is a noble fight.

    Here’s a relevant thought experiment: what gives a skier a better relative advantage? Blood doping vs. clean training or World Cup level skis/grinds with pure flouro waxes vs. the same ski purchased at a retail store with CH waxes? In my opinion, the blood doping fight needs to be won. But maybe, if we want to see a revival of cross country skiing in our culture, a solution to the latter disparity should also be addressed.

    Unfortunately, putting a halt to this at the professional level is probably not realistic at all. What about at developmental levels? Just recently, Norway banned the use of flouros at 16-under competitions.

    In Norway, everyone skis – we all know that. A big reason is the extent to which the sport is woven into the fabric of the nation’s very culture and way of life. Another reason is the availability of equipment to kids. If you want to see what I mean, try going on the Facebook Marketplace of a skiklubb in Oslo or Lillehammer. The reason this country is good is because everyone skis, and the reason everyone skis is because it is accessible. The key thesis of this entire argument is to make the sport accessible to all. But, participation shouldn’t be the only thing that is accessible, the ability to win should be, too.  

    “I don’t have them (4% Vaporflys) to wear and I don’t need them to win,” Huddle says. “I think you just need to be in really good shape.”

    That was Molly Huddle before the 2018 NYC Marathon. I wonder how long it will be before you won’t be able to say that about a running race. Can you imagine if a skier on the World Cup said something similar about expensive waxes or hand-selected skis? It would be blasphemous.

    In closing, I want to reiterate that the very thing I’m fighting against is something I’m actually really fascinated by and enjoy learning about. However, that is because of my position as a ski coach. I have access to different waxes, tools, and skis. I have the opportunity to work towards a mastery of all of those elements – a process which is challenging and enjoyable, albeit, still frustrating at times.

    My “beef” with it has nothing to do with that – it has everything to do with its effect on the sport catching on with the next generation. When I look in our wax supply shelf and go through our inventory here at the University of Maine at Presque Isle, I can’t help but tear up and think about myself as an 8 year-old boy, bundled up and standing in the yard in northern Minnesota as my mom or dad took out the three frozen dials of Swix kick wax we owned. That was all I ever even saw.

    Even as a skier training on my own just 18 months ago working as a full-time teacher – all I had in my toolbox, which was rededicated as a wax box, was CH 6 blue and CH 8 red glide wax. No LFs, HF’s, powders, or liquids. Two wax choices, one cork, one scraper, one brush, and an iron that Laura Ingalls Wilder probably used before it found its way to my family and eventually became dedicated to skis. I think there should be a place in our sport for people coming from that upbringing as well as the kids who are lucky enough to attend one of the many wonderful private schools we have in Colorado, Idaho, Vermont, and New Hampshire that allows kids access to great coaching, equipment, and time to focus on racing and development.

    Skiing is an enjoyable activity and a vehicle for transforming lives through teamwork, competition, goals, and intense training. I want everyone to have the chance to choose to be a skier. Hopefully, we all do, and that is where I hope this discussion leads.

     – Ryan Sederquist

    Ryan Sederquist University of Maine at Presque Isle Head Nordic Ski Coach